Home arrow Performance Tech arrow Myth: Adding more fuel to a N/A car makes mad powah! 20 November 2008  





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Parts Catalog
Dodge Specific (49) Mitsubishi Specific (126) Vinyl Decals (36) Brakes (2) Dress Up (10) Drivetrain (1) Engine (11) Fuel/Electronics (5) Forced Induction (1) Gauges (5) Intake (18) Nitrous (17) Suspension (6)

List All Products
Sep 12 2007
Myth: Adding more fuel to a N/A car makes mad powah! PDF Print E-mail
Written by Russ Sanderlin   
Wednesday, 12 September 2007

I have had customers over time purchase bigger injectors or ask for help installing fuel systems into their N/A near bone stock street cars. If you have a stock running naturally aspirated vehicle, manipulating your fuel system by adding parts which increase fuel volumes into the engine is not a good thing to do unless you put on some sort of forced induction to compensate.

Consider that a stoichimetric combustion ratio for gasoline is 14.7:1. Stoichimetric is the idea combustion process where all of the gas is burned completely. I'm sure you are familiar with running rich or lean, this is what dictates that idea. The ratio is mentioned above "14.7:1" is how many parts of air there is to fuel in a combustion. A ratio with a mixture less than 14.7:1 will result in left over fuel after the combustion (rich), a ratio with a mixture more than 14.7:1 is considered lean.

A good air fuel ratio on a turbo car for optimal performance is generally accepted among tuners to be "13:1", thirteen parts of air to one part of fuel. That is on the rich side, but this is good since it brings the combustion temps down. When vehicles come from the factory, naturally aspirated vehicles are tuned to 11:1-12:1 at wide open throttle, while turbo charged vehicles have shown to be tuned at 10:1-11:1 at wide open throttle. For the sake of vehicle production speed, a generic tune is placed on all car computer ECUs to insure that they all run relatively safe since not every single engine operates in the exact same manner. Fine tuning your engine performance to lean out your mixture will yield in a more efficient combustion which translates into more horsepower.

Lets say we run start running an air fuel ratio for example of 16:1. This is considered running too lean. By running too lean will generate extremely high temps, which in turn will cause the mixture to start igniting before the piston is even top dead center which is what we call "knock", or "detonation".

Understanding the basics of focusing on how fuel effects performance, hopefully you see why installing bigger injectors, a bigger fuel pump would cause you to run rich, lose horse power and potentially run into issues on a stock naturally aspirated vehicle configuration. Consider fuel upgrades when doing forced induction upgrades since potentially your stock fuel system won't be able to keep up with the extra air demand that you are forcing into the engine.

I just want to clarify that I wrote this article based on what people are doing with stock naturally aspirated street cars they buy from the dealership. I understand that naturally aspirated high performance race engines do need various fuel mods.  

A tool we offer used to tune and measure your air fuel ratios is a Wideband O2 sensor offered by AEM. Click for more information about the AEM UEGO Wideband.




  Comments (5)
 1 Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 14-09-2007 06:58
N/A fuel mods on a vehicle revving a couple thousand rpms higher than stock might serve a perpose would they not? Or would the stock fuel system supply enough fuel to feed the motor at 8500 rpm.
 2 Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it website, on 14-09-2007 13:39
That actually brings up a new topic for a blog! 
 
Typically on N/A cars by the time you hit the rev limiter you are out of your power band. Meaning that, since power is dropping off raising your rev limiter is futile. Typically also stock fuel systems are over engineered to supply a lot more fuel functionality than the car may ever use. 
 
For example, on the 3G V6 Eclipse, the stock fuel system with the proper tuning mechanisms is good for another 100 horsepower. 
 
I updated the blog to clarify that I wrote the article directed at those with nearly a bone stock street car they bought from the dealership. There are high reving high performance naturally aspirated engines that do need fuel mods to compensate. 
 
Thank you for commenting on our blog!
 3 Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 15-09-2007 05:37
How fast does the HP start to drop off on a 24v SOHC 6G72. With torque multiplication provided by lower gear ratio's horspower can fall off by as much as 30% from peak and your still better off riding out the gear given you're not running into other problems (valve float etc.) Also how high of rpm can the factory ecu handle, with a galant?
 4 Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it website, on 16-09-2007 00:30
When I can dig up a few dyno charts I'll post them up in a future blog so you can get an idea of what I'm talking about in terms of the power band on the 6G72.  
 
The redline on the Galant hits about 6400-6500 RPMs when you are bouncing off the rev limiter. At least that's what it shows on the data logs when I've run my car on the dyno in the past. But you can use ECUflash from http://ecuflash.org along with the cable that Colby provides from his commercial website http://www.tactrix.com to adjust the tune and rev limiter on your stock ECU. If you have a 99 or 2000 Galant, chances are you won't be able to flash that ECU.
 5 Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 16-09-2007 04:02
Actually I already have EcuFlash, and have noticed a bennofit from raising the rev limit to 6850, and I'm thinking about going higher. Especially since I'm looking at getting dyno'd soon, I'd like to see how far my powerband drops off and where it starts too. I know the 6G72 heads suck on the exhaust ports, but I'm looking at getting a header and port polish.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment

 
< Prev
Subscribe
feed image
Blog Catagories
Tearstone News
Product Updates
Performance Tech
Auto Industry
Random Thoughts
Featured Products
Powerslot Rotors - Rear
Powerslot Rotors - Rear
$156.80
Powerslot Rotors - Front V6 Mitsubishi Eclipse/Galant 1999~2000
Powerslot Rotors - Front V6 Mitsubishi Eclipse/Galant 1999~2000
$154.00
Mitsubishi Billet Fuel Rail Adapter
Mitsubishi Billet Fuel Rail Adapter
$25.00
New Listings
Energy Suspension 5.1102 Shifter Bushings
Energy Suspension 5.1102 Shifter Bushings

Prothane Eclipse Motor Mount Insert Kit 4cyl 00-05
Prothane Eclipse Motor Mount Insert Kit 4cyl 00-05

Prothane Eclipse Motor Mount Insert Kit V6 00-05
Prothane Eclipse Motor Mount Insert Kit V6 00-05

K & N Air Filter
K & N Air Filter
$38.00
AEM - V2 INDUCTION SYSTEM - Mitsubishi Eclipse RS and GS 00-05
AEM - V2 INDUCTION SYSTEM - Mitsubishi Eclipse RS and GS 00-05
$414.84
$282.09
You Save: 32.00%
AEM - Cold Air Intake - Mitsubishi Eclipse GT 2006
AEM - Cold Air Intake - Mitsubishi Eclipse GT 2006
$405.19
$275.53
You Save: 32.00%
AEM - 2.75" AIR BYPASS VALVE
AEM - 2.75
$62.45
$42.47
You Save: 32.00%
Site Map Back to Top
© 2008 Tearstone Performance
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.